Retail and shopping · amazon.com
Does Amazon allow AI agents?
Only with limits. Amazon's terms restrict automated access (amazon.com, terms dated 2026-08-14).
Source as of
Amazon's own rules for AI agents and automation.
Source: amazon.com · Terms: 2026-08-14
The Conditions of Use Agents section lets an agent use Amazon only if it identifies itself in every request, does not hide that it is an agent (for example by mimicking human keystrokes or completing or circumventing CAPTCHAs), and does not use Amazon once Amazon has asked it to refrain. The site license separately excludes data mining, robots, and similar data gathering and extraction tools. The Ninth Circuit vacated the preliminary injunction against Perplexity's Comet agent on 2026-08-04 and remanded; it denied rehearing en banc on 2026-09-10. That was a ruling in a preliminary-injunction appeal, not a final judgment.
- Our testing
- Report-only: we cite public reports and never test agents here
Reported
Reported: Amazon's Conditions of Use restrict AI agents: an agent may use Amazon only if it identifies itself and does not hide that it is an agent. The Ninth Circuit vacated the preliminary injunction against Perplexity's Comet agent on 2026-08-04 and remanded the case; that was a ruling in a preliminary-injunction appeal, not a final judgment. Amazon says third-party apps that buy for customers should operate openly and respect a business's decision whether to participate.
Reported verdict: based on the site's own published terms, not tested by us. Based on sources dated 2026-08-14 (terms), 2026-08-04 (court ruling) and 2025-11-04 (Amazon statement).
Evidence on this page:
- No Agent may use Amazon unless it identifies itself at all times and follows the Agent Terms technical rules
- Agents must not hide that they are agents, including by mimicking human keystrokes or completing or…
- Amazon's statement about Perplexity (Nov 4, 2025) says: third-party applications that offer to make…
- The Ninth Circuit (Aug 4, 2026) wrote: we VACATE the preliminary injunction granted by the district court…
What the site's own pages say
Each line links to the page it comes from. Lines marked as crawler rules come from the site's robots.txt and tell automated crawlers what not to fetch; they are not legal terms.
-
Amazon's statement about Perplexity (Nov 4, 2025) says: third-party applications that offer to make purchases on behalf of customers from other businesses should operate openly and respect service provider decisions whether or not to participate
-
Amazon's statement about Perplexity (Nov 4, 2025) says: we’ve repeatedly requested that Perplexity remove Amazon from the Comet experience
-
The Ninth Circuit (Aug 4, 2026) wrote: we VACATE the preliminary injunction granted by the district court and REMAND for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.
-
The Ninth Circuit (Aug 4, 2026, footnote 5) wrote: This outcome does not impair Amazon’s ability to regulate access to Amazon.com via private terms of service for its users.
-
The Ninth Circuit order (Sept 10, 2026) says: The Petition for Rehearing En Banc is DENIED.
-
Conditions of Use define an Agent as software or a service acting autonomously or semi-autonomously for a person
-
No Agent may use Amazon unless it identifies itself at all times and follows the Agent Terms technical rules
-
No Agent may use Amazon Services if Amazon has asked it to refrain
-
Agents must name themselves in every HTTP request's user agent string ("Agent/[agent name]")
-
Agents must not hide that they are agents, including by mimicking human keystrokes or completing or circumventing CAPTCHAs
-
Agents must not get around measures Amazon uses to block or limit agents
-
The site license excludes data mining, robots, and similar data gathering and extraction tools
-
Amazon's robots.txt (a crawler rule, not a legal ban): disallows the whole site for named AI user agents, including ChatGPT-User, Claude-User, Perplexity-User and GoogleAgent-Shopping
Sources
- Amazon.com Conditions of Use 2026-08-14
- Amazon robots.txt source undated, checked 2026-10-27
- Amazon: Statement about Perplexity 2025-11-04
- Amazon.com Services v. Perplexity AI, 9th Cir. No. 26-1444 opinion 2026-08-04
- Ninth Circuit order denying rehearing en banc, No. 26-1444 (hosted by Courthouse News) 2026-09-10
Weekly: what AI agents can and can't do
One short email a week with the new dated results and policy changes.
Sign-up opens soon