Muse vs OpenAI Dots
Last checked
Facts from dated sources, side by side
Each fact links to the page it comes from, with the date it applies to. Official source = a first-party page; Reported by <site> = a third-party page.
Muse
Compare(7)
-
Free tier exists, metered by a usage limit that refreshes
-
Muse lets you upgrade to a paid subscription once you reach the free limit. The Muse page we checked gives no price.
-
Muse app on mobile, Mac app, and WhatsApp
-
Persistent isolated Linux VM with a full browser shared with the user
-
Connects email, calendar, Instagram and other daily apps; builds missing tools
-
Asks permission before sending messages, making purchases, sharing info; allow once/always/deny
-
Keeps working after app is closed
OpenAI Dots
Compare(10)
-
First dot bundled into Pro or Business Premium at no extra cost; plan price not stated on the page
-
No free plan documented; rollout limited to Pro, Business Premium, Enterprise/Edu/Healthcare beta
-
ChatGPT desktop, web, mobile; Slack and Teams; texting coming soon
-
Own cloud computer plus own browser plus connected apps
-
Plugin ecosystem claimed to reach over 4,000 apps
-
Built-in rules on independent action; Custom Rules; auto-review; password changes always human
-
Certain sensitive tasks reserved for the user
-
OpenAI's announcement names Pro and Business Premium users in ChatGPT "in eligible markets" and does not list which countries.
-
Dots plans include an allowance for deeper work, with extended limits for the first month after launch. The announcement gives no number for the limit.
-
Dot conversations excluded from ChatGPT usage limits; Codex/ChatGPT Work tasks still count
Coverage: Muse: Reported only (no first-hand tests in the MVP). OpenAI Dots: Reported only (no first-hand tests in the MVP).