Claude Code vs OpenClaw
Last checked
Facts from dated sources, side by side
Each fact links to the page it comes from, with the date it applies to. Official source = a first-party page; Reported by <site> = a third-party page.
Claude Code
Compare(5)
-
Included in Pro ($17/mo billed annually at $200 up front, or $20 monthly) and Max (from $100/mo); also included in Team and Enterprise seats
-
No free tier: Claude Code marked 'No' on the Free plan
-
Not stated on claude.com/pricing as of 2026-10-20
-
US-only inference offered for workloads that must run in the US, at 1.1x input/output pricing (stated for the Claude API/platform)
-
Usage limits apply to plans; page links to Anthropic's usage-limit policy. No numeric cap stated on this page
OpenClaw
Compare(8)
-
Not stated on docs.openclaw.ai as of 2026-10-20
-
No paid tier; free to self-host (MIT licensed). Model usage billed by the chosen provider, per page
-
macOS / Linux / WSL2 ... Windows (PowerShell)
-
Acts through chat-app channels plus a dedicated agent browser; self-hosted gateway bridges messaging apps to AI coding agents
-
Documented browser capability: a dedicated browser the agent can use, via the browser setup guide
-
Discord, Google Chat, iMessage, Matrix, Microsoft Teams, Signal, Slack, Telegram, WhatsApp, Zalo, plus plugin channels
-
If you want to lock it down, start with channels.whatsapp.allowFrom and (for groups) mention rules.
-
Runtime requirement Node 26 recommended (or Node 24.16+/26.1+), plus an API key from a chosen model provider
Coverage: Claude Code: Reported only (no first-hand tests in the MVP). OpenClaw: Reported only (no first-hand tests in the MVP).